Our people
Partner, Patent Attorney
Life Sciences
Bristol
UPC Representative Oppositions ExpertOur IP specialists work at all stages of the IP life cycle and provide strategic advice about patent, trade mark and registered designs, as well as any IP-related disputes and legal and commercial requirements.
View the teamWe want to keep you up to date with developments in the IP world and let you know what we are up to at Mewburn Ellis.
Learn moreWe believe in making it easy for you to find the information that you want – and you can always contact us if you can’t find what you need
Read our law and practice guidesChristopher (Chris) handles the full range of patent work in the life sciences sector, from pre-drafting advice to drafting and prosecution of worldwide patent portfolios. He also has experience with IP due diligence and European oppositions.
Areas of Expertise
Clients
Chris works with a wide range of clients in the life sciences field, including universities, charities and research institutions, spin-outs and SMEs to multinationals.
Background
Chris has a degree in natural sciences (pharmacology) from the University of Cambridge and a PhD from University College London, relating to the neurochemistry of Alzheimer’s disease. He carried out post-doctoral research at a multinational pharmaceutical company before joining Mewburn Ellis LLP in 2004, qualifying as a Chartered Patent Attorney in 2007 and a European Patent Attorney in 2008. He joined the partnership in 2011.
Opposition highlights
Chris has worked on multiple opposition cases, including:
EP2734549, T0102/20 – 3.3.04: Straw person opposition against the patent covering Lokivetmab, the first monoclonal antibody to be approved for veterinary use in the European Union. This Zoetis patent was revoked by the Board of Appeal.
EP3219729: Straw person opposition against patent covering feline use of an anti-IL-31 antibody was also revoked by the Opposition Division.
EP1224273, T0754/10 – 3.3.02: An offensive opposition for Danisco US Inc. of Novozymes A/S, the patent directed to enzyme-containing granules. The patent was finally revoked by Board of Appeal.
EP1032655, T1663/08 – 3.3.08: An offensive opposition for Genencor International, Inc. of Novozymes A/S for a patent directed to protease variants having improved wash performance. The patent was maintained in amended form by the opposition division. Following our arguments at the appeal oral proceedings, the patent proprietor withdrew approval of the text and the patent was revoked.
EP1141286: An offensive opposition for AstraZeneca AB of Genetics Institute, LLC and Johns Hopkins University. It was a patent directed to IL-13 antagonists for use in treatment of allergic conditions or cancer. The patent was revoked by the Opposition Division.